HER2-low & HER2-ultralow Efficacy Data

In patients with HR+/HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH–) and HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining) mBC

ENHERTU provided 13.2 months median PFS vs 8.1 months with chemotherapy1,2

Median PFS in the overall study population (HER2-low and HER2-ultralow; secondary endpoint)

KM curve depicting (13.2 months mPFS) with ENHERTU compared to (8.1 months mPFS) with chemotherapy in the overall study population, which included patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH–) or HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining) KM curve depicting (13.2 months mPFS) with ENHERTU compared to (8.1 months mPFS) with chemotherapy in the overall study population, which included patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH–) or HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining)

36% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death with ENHERTU (HR=0.64; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.76; P<0.0001)1,a

aBased on unstratified analysis.

Over 60% ORR with ENHERTU and 34.4% with chemotherapy1,2,b

Confirmed objective response in the overall study population (HER2-low and HER2-ultralow; secondary endpoint; N=866)

Bar chart (62.6% ORR) with ENHERTU and (34.4% ORR) with chemotherapy in the overall study population, which included patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) or HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining) Bar chart (62.6% ORR) with ENHERTU and (34.4% ORR) with chemotherapy in the overall study population, which included patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) or HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining)
  • mDOR was 14.3 months with ENHERTU and 8.6 months with chemotherapy1,b
  • ORR and DOR were not tested for statistical significance and were not powered to show differences between treatment arms. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known

Additional results

  • 77.1% clinical benefit rate (CBR) (CR+PR+SD at week 24) with ENHERTU (n=303/393) and 50.9% with chemotherapy (n=198/389)3

Over 90% (n=362/393) of patients achieved disease control (CR+PR+SD) with ENHERTU3,c

  • CBR and DCR were not tested for statistical significance and were not powered to show differences between treatment arms. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known

bAnalysis was performed based on the patients with measurable disease assessed by BICR at baseline.

cDCR was 92.1% with ENHERTU (n=362/393) and 80.5% with chemotherapy (n=313/389).3

Efficacy outcomes were consistent in the HER2-low and overall study populations, with similar results in the exploratory HER2-ultralow cohort1

Summary of DESTINY-Breast06 efficacy results by patient population

Table depicting the summary of the DESTINY-Breast06 efficacy results by patient population. Overall study population (N=866), HER2-low  (IHC 1+ or IHC 2 +/ISH-) cohort (n=713), and Exploratory HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining) cohort (n=153).
Table depicting the summary of the DESTINY-Breast06 efficacy results by patient population. Overall study population (N=866), HER2-low  (IHC 1+ or IHC 2 +/ISH-) cohort (n=713), and Exploratory HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining) cohort (n=153).
  • ORR was not tested for statistical significance and was not powered to show differences between treatment arms. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known

The results of DESTINY-Breast06 extend the potential benefits of HER2-directed therapy to more patients, including those with HR+/HER2-ultralow mBC1

dThe HER2-ultralow cohort was an exploratory population. The data are descriptive and were not tested for statistical significance, nor powered to show a difference between treatment arms. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known.

eBased on unstratified analysis.

fBased on stratified analysis with stratification factors prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use (yes vs no) and HER2 IHC status of tumor samples (IHC 1+ vs IHC 2+/ISH–).

gAnalysis was performed based on the patients with measurable disease assessed by BICR at baseline.

hAs demonstrated in DESTINY-Breast06 screening data. Among the 1856 patients screened for participation in the study, 12% (225 patients) had IHC 0 with absent membrane staining, while 22% (402 patients) were classified as HER2-ultralow, defined as IHC 0 with membrane staining. IHC 1+ was observed in 45% (829 patients), and IHC 2+/ISH– in 21% (385 patients).4

ADDITIONAL DATA

In patients with HR+/HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH–) and HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining) mBC

Results observed with ENHERTU in select exploratory patient subgroups in the overall study population1,5,6

EXPLORATORY POST-HOC ANALYSIS
  • These subgroup data are based on an exploratory post-hoc analysis; they were not tested for statistical significance and not powered to show differences between treatment arms or between subgroups. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known

Median PFS: select subgroup results in the overall study population3,5

EXPLORATORY POST-HOC ANALYSIS
  • These subgroup data are based on an exploratory post-hoc analysis; they were not tested for statistical significance and not powered to show differences between treatment arms or between subgroups. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known

Confirmed ORR: select subgroup results in the overall study population (BICR)6,i

Capecitabine (60% of patients)

Taxanes (40% of patients)

iENHERTU and TPC subgroups were matched by choice of TPC before randomization.

NCCN GUIDELINES® PREFERRED

NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK® (NCCN®) recommended option for eligible patients with HR+ mBC who have low HER2 levels

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) recommends fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (ENHERTU) for recurrent unresectable (local or regional) or stage IV HER2– breast cancer as an NCCN Category 2A, 1L other recommended option for patients with HR-positive disease who are in visceral crisis or are endocrine refractory with tumors that are HER2 IHC 0+, 1+, or 2+/ISH-negative and have no germline BRCA1/2 mutation7,j-l

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) RECOMMENDED

NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK® (NCCN®) recommended option for eligible patients with HR+ mBC who have low HER2 levels

NCCN Guidelines® recommends fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (ENHERTU) for recurrent unresectable (local or regional) or stage IV HER2– breast cancer as an NCCN Category 2A, 1L other recommended option for patients with HR-positive disease who are in visceral crisis or are endocrine refractory with tumors that are HER2 IHC 0+, 1+, or 2+/ISH-negative and have no germline BRCA1/2 mutation7,j-l

jIHC 0+ refers to tumors with faint, partial membrane staining in ≤10% of tumor cells.

kAssess for germline BRCA1/2 mutations in all patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer to identify candidates for PARPi therapy.

lThe distinction between HER2 test results of IHC 0/absent membrane staining, IHC 0+/with membrane staining (faint, partial membrane staining in ≤10%), IHC 1+, or 2+/ISH negative is currently clinically relevant for therapy selection.

BICR, blinded independent central review; BRCA1/2, BReast CAncer gene 1 or 2; CBR, clinical benefit rate; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio; HR+, hormone receptor-positive; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization; mBC, metastatic breast cancer; mDOR, median duration of response; mPFS, median progression-free survival; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®); ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TPC, treatment of physician's choice.