Support and Resources for Healthcare Professionals
Resources and support for healthcare professionals
Filter by Indication
- All
- HER2+ eBC
- HER2+ mBC
- HER2-low and HER2-ultralow mBC
- HER2-mutant mNSCLC
- HER2+ aGC
- HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors
Video resources
Clinical Conversations:
Understanding HR+/HER2-low & HER2-ultralow mBC
DESTINY-Breast06 trial results & determining
patient eligibility
Dr Pegram reviews the DESTINY-Breast06 trial in patients with HR+/HER2-low or HER2-ultralow mBC, including eligibility criteria, patient demographics, and key efficacy and safety data.
Downloadable resources
All Indications
ILD Identification and Management Guide
Learn how to identify early signs of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis and how to manage them.
All Indications
Therapy Management Guide
Review efficacy and safety data and adverse reaction management details for all indications.
All Indications
Dosing and Administration Guide
Understand how to dose, prepare, and administer for all indications.
Downloadable resources for pathologists
All Indications
HER2 Testing Guide for Pathologists
Review HER2 IHC testing information and scoring criteria for all ENHERTU indications.
HER2-low and HER2-ultralow mBC
HER2-ultralow mBC Testing Summary for Pathologists
Learn about identification and reporting of HER2-ultralow status in mBC.
ENHERTU4U provides support resources for patients prescribed ENHERTU
To receive support for your patients and obtain more information about reimbursement, visit ENHERTU4U.com or call 1-833-ENHERTU (1-833-364-3788)
HER2 Alterations in mNSCLC
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors, including Gynecologic Cancers
HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at
Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line
HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of
knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety
outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1
from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from
DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings
and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is
important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent
like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus
T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with
HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good
performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or
HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated
superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median
progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment
decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a
key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies
directly against active comparators, has made it easier to
anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of
life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and
assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of
Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and
EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The
analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive
deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs
were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21
days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and
questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles
indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality
of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard
ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was
defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and
the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration
event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified
change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the
specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration
on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as
having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was
assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1.
Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher
score to represent higher or “better” global health status or
overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from
baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in
DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score
represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales
represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom
scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive
and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected
treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the
patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution
due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be
confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic
breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of
treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive
breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a
meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and
tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the
key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left
ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of
ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including
laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in
DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no
Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in
second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of
every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will
you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast
cancer?
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
HER2 Alterations in mNSCLC
HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at
Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line
HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of
knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety
outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1
from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from
DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings
and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is
important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent
like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus
T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with
HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good
performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or
HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated
superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median
progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment
decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a
key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies
directly against active comparators, has made it easier to
anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of
life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and
assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of
Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and
EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The
analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive
deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs
were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21
days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and
questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles
indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality
of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard
ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was
defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and
the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration
event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified
change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the
specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration
on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as
having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was
assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1.
Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher
score to represent higher or “better” global health status or
overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from
baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in
DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score
represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales
represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom
scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive
and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected
treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the
patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution
due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be
confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic
breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of
treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive
breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a
meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and
tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the
key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left
ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of
ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including
laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in
DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no
Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in
second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of
every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will
you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast
cancer?
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
Clinical Conversations:
AR management & patient experience
HER2-mutant mNSCLC HER2+ aGC HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
Clinical Conversations:
Reviewing DESTINY-Breast09 trial results
Explore ENHERTU + pertuzumab in 1L HER2+ mBC
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
Clinical Conversations:
Understanding HR+/HER2-low & HER2-ultralow mBC
DESTINY-Breast06 trial
results & determining patient eligibility
Hello, I’m Dr Mark Pegram, a medical oncologist from Palo Alto, CA. For the past 35 years, my clinical research has been focused on therapeutic strategies targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).
Today we’ll be discussing the evolving role of HER2-directed therapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, or mBC. I’ll review the results of the DESTINY-Breast06 trial and steps for identifying patients with HR+/HER2-low or HR+/HER2-ultralow mBC who may be eligible for ENHERTU.
ENHERTU (or fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) has serious warnings and precautions. Patients should be closely monitored for potential symptoms of interstitial lung disease (or ILD) and pneumonitis. For full Prescribing Information, including Boxed WARNINGS and Medication Guide, please visit EnhertuSafetyHCP.com.
The majority of patients with breast cancer are classified as HER2-negative. However, evolving research into the spectrum of HER2 expression shows that most patients who are diagnosed with HER2-negative breast cancer actually have low levels of HER2.
ENHERTU was previously approved in 2022 as the first and only HER2-directed therapy for HER2-low mBC in previously treated patients.
In 2025, based on the Phase 3 DESTINY-Breast06 trial, ENHERTU was approved for HR+/HER2-low and HR+/HER2-ultralow mBC after at least 1 line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting. This approval gives eligible patients the opportunity for HER2-directed therapy directly after endocrine therapy, with proven benefit for those with lower levels of HER2 expression. It is important to note that severe, life-threatening, or fatal ILD, including pneumonitis, can occur in patients treated with ENHERTU. It is important to monitor patients for signs and symptoms, and promptly investigate evidence of ILD.
Approximately 85 to 90% of patients with HR+/HER2-negative mBC may have actionable levels of HER2, based on screening data from the DESTINY-Breast06 trial. This evolving view of HER2-negative classification is changing how we approach the treatment of mBC. Please be sure to collaborate with your pathologist to determine whether your patients may have HER2-low or HER2-ultralow disease.
ENHERTU can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women. It’s important to advise patients of this potential risk, and to verify pregnancy status prior to initiating ENHERTU.
When managing metastatic breast cancer in clinical practice, our goal is to prevent or delay disease progression for as long as possible in order to mitigate against potential accumulation of disease-related symptoms, which may negatively impact patients’ lifestyles.
PFS steeply declines as patients progress through lines of treatment for HR+/HER2-negative mBC. Median PFS drops by about 80% from first-line endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitor to first systemic single-agent chemotherapy.
It is also important to consider that in HR+/HER2-negative mBC, after each line of treatment, there is attrition—calculated as the percentage of patients who completed a certain line of therapy but did not start the next treatment line.
Now, let’s review the clinical results demonstrated in the DESTINY-Breast06 trial.
DESTINY-Breast06 is a Phase 3 trial of ENHERTU vs physician’s choice of chemotherapy in 866 patients. 713 patients were in the HR+/HER2-low cohort and 153 patients were in the exploratory HR+/HER2-ultralow cohort.
Eligible patients had disease progression on:
- at least 2 lines of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting
- or 1 line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting and either
- progression within 24 months of the start of adjuvant endocrine therapy
- or within 6 months of starting first-line endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment in the metastatic setting
Median PFS in HR+/HER2-low mBC, the primary endpoint of the trial, was 13.2 months with ENHERTU vs 8.1 months with chemotherapy. With a hazard ratio of 0.62, this translated to a statistically significant 38% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death with ENHERTU compared to chemotherapy.
The majority of patients receiving ENHERTU achieved a confirmed objective response, a secondary endpoint. The objective response rate was 62% with ENHERTU and 35.2% with chemotherapy. Objective response rate was not tested for statistical significance, so the clinical significance of these data is unknown.
An exploratory post-hoc analysis of the overall study population, including patients with HR+/HER2-low and HR+/HER2-ultralow mBC, offers additional insight into the exploratory results with ENHERTU. In the analysis, median PFS was 23.3 months with ENHERTU and 11.3 months with chemotherapy in patients without visceral disease. These exploratory subgroup data were not tested for statistical significance and not powered to show differences between treatment arms or between subgroups. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known.
Next, let’s turn to the Kaplan-Meier analysis of the median PFS in the HR+/HER2-ultralow exploratory population.
Here, the median PFS in the ENHERTU arm was 15.1 months and 8.3 months in the patients randomized to the chemotherapy treatment arm. The exploratory HER2-ultralow data are descriptive and were not tested for statistical significance; the clinical significance of these data is not known.
In this exploratory cohort, there was a 65.7% confirmed objective response rate with ENHERTU and 30.8% with chemotherapy. The exploratory HER2-ultralow data are descriptive and were not tested for statistical significance; the clinical significance of these data is not known.
As demonstrated in the DESTINY-Breast06 screening data, in patients with HR+/HER2-negative mBC, about 60% of tumors reported as IHC 0 are actually HER2-ultralow, which is defined as IHC 0 with membrane staining.
My approach to managing mBC has evolved in step with the ENHERTU approvals in HER2-low and HR+/HER2-ultralow mBC. To determine potential eligibility, I review each patient’s HER2 IHC report. In patients with an IHC score of zero, reported scores often vary, and there are differences in how HER2-ultralow (or IHC 0 with membrane staining) is described. Some reports may specify IHC 0+ with membrane staining or simply IHC 0+. And although reports often differ in terms of where membrane staining descriptions can be found, I always refer to the pathologist’s comments. If I am unable to determine whether membrane staining is present, I contact the pathologist for reevaluation.
It is important to me to identify eligible patients with any membrane staining who may be appropriate for treatment with ENHERTU.
When considering treatment with ENHERTU, it is of course necessary to consider potential side effects.
Severe, life-threatening, or fatal ILD, including pneumonitis, can occur in patients treated with ENHERTU. In DESTINY-Breast06, ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 11.3% of patients. The majority of these events were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 5—or fatal—events were observed in 0.7% of patients.
Common adverse reactions were observed in DESTINY-Breast06; the majority were Grade 1 or 2. The median duration of treatment was 11 months with ENHERTU and 5.6 months with chemotherapy.
Common laboratory abnormalities were also observed.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU at the 5.4 mg/kg dose highlight key adverse events of interest in patients with mBC and other solid tumors, including ILD/pneumonitis, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction, defined as decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction. There may be additional side effects with ENHERTU. For more information, please see the full Prescribing Information available at EnhertuSafetyHCP.com.
I’ve been delighted to have this opportunity to share some of the data from the DESTINY-Breast06 clinical trial with you. How many of your patients with metastatic breast cancer could be eligible for ENHERTU?
Visit LowHER2.com to take a deeper look at the DESTINY-Breast06 trial results and learn more about identifying patients with HR+/HER2-low or HR+/HER2-ultralow mBC who may be eligible for ENHERTU after 1 to 2 lines of endocrine therapy.