Support and Resources for Healthcare Professionals
Resources and support for healthcare professionals
Filter by Indication
- All
- HER2+ eBC
- HER2+ mBC
- HER2-low and HER2-ultralow mBC
- HER2-mutant mNSCLC
- HER2+ aGC
- HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors
Downloadable resources
All Indications
ILD Identification and Management Guide
Learn how to identify early signs of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis and how to manage them.
All Indications
Therapy Management Guide
Review efficacy and safety data and adverse reaction management details for all indications.
All Indications
Dosing and Administration Guide
Understand how to dose, prepare, and administer for all indications.
Downloadable resources for pathologists
All Indications
HER2 Testing Guide for Pathologists
Review HER2 IHC testing information and scoring criteria for all ENHERTU indications.
HER2-low and HER2-ultralow mBC
HER2-ultralow mBC Testing Summary for Pathologists
Learn about identification and reporting of HER2-ultralow status in mBC.
ENHERTU4U provides support resources for patients prescribed ENHERTU
To receive support for your patients and obtain more information about reimbursement, visit ENHERTU4U.com or call 1-833-ENHERTU (1-833-364-3788)
HER2 Alterations in mNSCLC
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors, including Gynecologic Cancers
HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
HER2 Alterations in mNSCLC
HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
Clinical Conversations:
AR management & patient experience
HER2-mutant mNSCLC HER2+ aGC HER2+ (IHC 3+) Metastatic Solid Tumors
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
Clinical Conversations:
Reviewing DESTINY-Breast09 trial results
Explore ENHERTU + pertuzumab in 1L HER2+ mBC
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?
Clinical Conversations:
Understanding HR+/HER2-low & HER2-ultralow mBC
DESTINY-Breast06 trial results & determining patient eligibility
Hi, I’m Dr Jules Cohen, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Stony Brook University.
Through my experience treating many patients with second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, I have gained a wealth of knowledge as it relates to the potential efficacy and safety outcomes associated with this diagnosis.
As part of our discussion today, we’re going to review:
- The superior PFS results for ENHERTU versus T-DM1 from the head-to-head DESTINY-Breast03 trial
- Health-related quality of life data from DESTINY-Breast03, and
- Important Safety Information, including Warnings and Precautions, and the most common adverse reactions
With HER2-positivity as the primary driver of disease, it is important to initiate patients on an established HER2-targeted agent like ENHERTU at the earliest possible opportunity.
DESTINY-Breast03 was a Phase 3, head-to-head study of ENHERTU versus T-DM1, which included 524 previously treated adults with HER2-positive mBC.
A range of patients were studied, including those with good performance status, various sites of metastases, and HR-positive or HR-negative status.
In the initial analysis of DESTINY-Breast03, ENHERTU demonstrated superior PFS versus T-DM1.
In the exploratory analysis, ENHERTU reached a median progression-free survival of 28.8 months and 6.8 months with T-DM1.
Before head-to-head studies, oncologists often guiding treatment decisions based on side effect profiles, with quality of life as a key consideration. The design of modern trials, comparing therapies directly against active comparators, has made it easier to anticipate or predict quality-of-life outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes, or PROs, of health-related quality of life were prespecified secondary endpoints in DESTINY-Breast03 and assessed throughout the study using the oncology-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, breast cancer–specific instrument, and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analogue scale. The analyses of these questionnaires included time to definitive deterioration, change from baseline, and other measurements. PROs were evaluated on a fixed schedule. One cycle was equivalent to 21 days with ENHERTU or T-DM1 administered on day 1 of each cycle and questionnaires completed before treatment on day 1 of cycles indicated.
Median time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported quality of life was assessed in DESTINY-Breast03. Any measure with a hazard ratio of less than 1 favors ENHERTU. Time to deterioration was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which the definitive deterioration event was first seen. A patient must have experienced a prespecified change, greater than or equal to 10-points from baseline of the specific score in the direction of deterioration, and deterioration on 2 or more consecutive visits or at the last visit to classify as having a definitive deterioration event.
Global health status from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed over time in patients treated with ENHERTU and T-DM1. Scores range from 0 to 100 with investigators considering a higher score to represent higher or “better” global health status or overall quality of life. Conversely, a negative 10-point change from baseline was prespecified as definitive deterioration in DESTINY-Breast03.
PRO measures are reported such that a high GHS/QoL or VAS score represents a high quality of life, a high score on functional scales represents a high level of functioning, and a high score on symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology.
It is important to note that the EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all-inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of additional expected treatment-related symptoms or overall side effect burden from the patient perspective. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design of the study and because TDD may be confounded by events not related to disease or treatment.
Assessing health-related quality of life in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a key component to understanding the impact of treatment beyond clinical efficacy and safety. As HER2-positive breast cancer progresses, maintaining quality of life becomes a meaningful measurement in addition to treatment outcomes and tolerability, regardless of disease stage.
The pooled safety data for ENHERTU 5.4 mg/kg further highlight the key safety signals of interest—ILD, neutropenia, and left ventricular dysfunction—confirming the benefit-risk profile of ENHERTU.
ENHERTU is associated with common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities. While ILD and pneumonitis were reported in DESTINY-Breast03, the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2, with no Grade 4 or 5 events observed.
ENHERTU continues to establish itself as the standard of care in second-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. At the heart of every decision we make is our commitment to our patients. How will you transform outcomes for your patients with HER2-positive breast cancer?