HER2-low Efficacy Data

In patients with HR+/HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH–) mBC

ENHERTU provided 13.2 months median PFS vs 8.1 months with chemotherapy

ENHERTU demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit in HR+/HER2-low mBC (primary endpoint, BICR)1,2

  • ENHERTU significantly improved mPFS vs physician-choice chemotherapy, including IV and oral options1
  • At the time of the PFS final analysis, OS data were not yet mature1

38% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death with ENHERTU (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.75; P<0.0001)1,a

aBased on stratified analysis with stratification factors prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use (yes vs no) and HER2 IHC status of tumor samples (IHC 1+ vs IHC 2+/ISH–).

Over 60% ORR with ENHERTU and 35.2% with chemotherapy

Secondary endpoint: confirmed objective response in the HER2-low mBC population (BICR)1,3,b

  • mDOR was 14.1 months with ENHERTU and 8.6 months with chemotherapy1,b
  • ORR and DOR were not tested for statistical significance and were not powered to show differences between treatment arms. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known

Additional results

  • Median time to response (TTR) was 2.7 months with ENHERTU and 2.6 months with chemotherapy4
  • 77.3% clinical benefit rate (CBR) (CR+PR+SD at week 24) with ENHERTU (n=252/326) and 53.1% with chemotherapy (n=172/324)4

Over 90% (n=300/326) of patients achieved disease control (CR+PR+SD) with ENHERTU4,c

  • TTR, CBR, and DCR were not tested for statistical significance and were not powered to show differences between treatment arms. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known

bAnalysis was performed based on the patients with measurable disease assessed by BICR at baseline.

cDCR was 92% with ENHERTU (n=300/326) and 79.9% with chemotherapy (n=259/324).4

PFS results observed with ENHERTU in prespecified exploratory patient subgroups2,3

  • Subgroups were chosen based on those chosen in the New England Journal of Medicine publicationf
  • Prespecified exploratory patient subgroups were not tested for statistical significance and not powered to show differences between treatment arms or between subgroups. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known

dPrimary endocrine resistance was defined as relapse that had occurred during the first 2 years of adjuvant ET or progressive disease that had occurred within the first 6 months after 1L ET for mBC while the patient was receiving ET; secondary (acquired) endocrine resistance was defined as relapse that had occurred while the patient was receiving adjuvant ET but after the first 2 years of therapy, within 12 months after completion of adjuvant ET, or progressive disease that had occurred more than 6 months after initiation of ET for mBC while the patient was receiving ET.

eThe physician’s choice of chemotherapy (capecitabine, nab–paclitaxel, or paclitaxel) was specified before randomization. Patients in the ENHERTU arm were selected to be proportional to the chemotherapy arm.

fLiver metastases was not a prespecified subgroup.

1L, first line; BICR, blinded independent central review; CBR, clinical benefit rate; CDK4/6, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; ET, endocrine therapy; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio; HR+, hormone receptor-positive; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization; IV, intravenous; mBC, metastatic breast cancer; mDOR, median duration of response; mPFS, median progression-free survival; NE, not evaluable; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TTR, time to response.